The Texas logic model evaluation tool was developed for coalitions as an effective way to ensure program success. The point of developing a logic model is to come up with a relatively simple image that reflects how and why certain programs will work. Logic models should be developed collaboratively with coalition members and other stakeholders or partners. Using a logic model throughout your program helps organize and systematically plan programs. It is a work in progress that can be refined as the program develops or changes. –P0

One advantage of using a visual logic model is that the coalition can adjust approaches and change courses as program plans are developed. The tool can also be used to demonstrate any progress the coalitions are making towards achieving sustainability.

Second, the user-friendly logic model process can provide a worthwhile activity for the coalition. It serves as a planning tool to clearly explain and illustrate program concepts to the community stakeholders, including potential funders.

Third, ongoing assessment, review, and corrections can produce better program design. A system is in place to strategically monitor and manage program activities.

Read the logic model from left to right to follow the chain of reasoning which connects all of the categories. Tailor the logic model to your coalition structure and goals.

Goals: This column should reflect the project goals. Start with a group discussion and decide on mutual goals. Ensure the goals are realistic, but allowing room for improvement. If you are using an existing project agreement, perhaps the project goals could be used as a guide.

Process for Achieving Goal: Ideas for this process can be discussed with coalition members along with conducting research of other programs and best practices. This category describes action steps for achieving each goal involving the entire coalition or individual members.

Evaluation Questions: Identify questions to answer that relate back to the identified goal.

These evaluation questions are very direct and to the point. Baseline data can be collected on traffic crash injuries, local seat belt observations surveys, ACTS results and other data sources.

How will the questions be answered? Activities in this category could include redistributing various surveys, collecting information on number of training programs, reviewing coalition minutes and attendance rosters, etc.

Activity Outcomes: This column can be completed by the coalition members at a meeting or by the Coalition Coordinator. The activity outcomes could describe any behavior/ attitude changes, knowledge increase, increased coalition/community capacity or changes as a result of program activities.

• Distribute a sample of the logic model to coalition members at a meting. The Texas logic model can be used as a guide.
• Start with an open discussion of mutual goals and prepare a list of project goals. The goals should be realistic, but allow room for improvement.
• An existing project agreement could be used to define the goals, activities and outcomes.
• Design evaluation questions that specifically address the goal. Activity evaluation questions might require volunteer coalition members to answer the questions or collect more information.
• The activity outcome category is completed by all of the coalition members at a meeting after the programs have been in place (for at least one year).
• Review the logic model every three to six months to make adjustments and corrections. Include this as a coalition meeting agenda item.

• Results from the model can be used to obtain future funding and include in an existing project agreement.
• Promote programs and coalition activities in various news media outlets and include information in a coalition brochure.
• Program outcomes could result in community change by sharing the information with local policy makers.
• Use the logic model to plan future programs as a coalition activity.